Free legal tools for attorneys and the public - Browse all 260+ tools
Personal injury and mass tort

Talcum powder claim screener

Johnson and Johnson and other talc manufacturers have faced thousands of lawsuits linking talcum powder to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. This screener checks your usage history and diagnosis to assess your claim.

Takes 2 minutes Free - no signup Last updated:
Ad space - 728x90
Legal information only. This screener identifies potential claim eligibility. An attorney determines final qualification. See our full disclaimer.

Talcum powder claim screener

Your talcum powder claim evaluation

Connect with a talcum powder attorney

A talc litigation attorney will review your case at no cost. No fee unless you win.

Confidential. No obligation. No fee unless you win.

Talcum powder and cancer - the litigation background

For decades, Johnson and Johnson marketed talc-based products including Johnson's Baby Powder and Shower to Shower for perineal hygiene use. Internal company documents revealed in litigation showed J&J knew for decades that their talc was contaminated with asbestos and that perineal talc use was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk - yet the company concealed this from the public and regulators.

J&J discontinued US sales of talc-based Baby Powder in 2020 and attempted to use a controversial bankruptcy strategy ("Texas Two-Step") to cap its talc liability. Courts initially blocked this approach. As of 2024-2025, the talc litigation continues with billions of dollars at stake across thousands of individual lawsuits.

Two types of talc claims

Talcum powder claims fall into 2 categories. Ovarian cancer claims involve women who used talc products for perineal hygiene and later developed ovarian cancer. The scientific evidence linking perineal talc use to ovarian cancer has been recognized by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Mesothelioma claims involve anyone - male or female - who was exposed to asbestos-contaminated talc through regular product use and developed mesothelioma. Both claim types have produced significant verdicts and settlements.

Settlement status

J&J has proposed global settlement amounts in the billions to resolve the talc litigation. Whether individual claimants should accept a settlement or continue individual litigation depends on their specific diagnosis and damages. An attorney can advise on the best path based on current settlement terms and your specific case value.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, for mesothelioma claims. Men who regularly used talcum powder products and developed mesothelioma have viable claims based on asbestos contamination in the talc. The ovarian cancer claims are specific to women, but mesothelioma from talc exposure has no gender restriction. See the mesothelioma case evaluator if you have a mesothelioma diagnosis.
J&J has attempted to use subsidiary bankruptcy to resolve talc claims, but courts have largely rejected this approach. Even if a bankruptcy-based settlement is ultimately approved, claimants typically receive compensation through the trust established by the bankruptcy plan. An attorney tracking the latest developments can advise on how any bankruptcy proceeding affects your specific claim and timeline.
Individual talcum powder verdicts have ranged from hundreds of thousands to hundreds of millions of dollars. The 2018 Missouri verdict awarded $4.69 billion to 22 women. Settlement amounts in global resolution proposals are typically lower per claimant but provide faster certainty. Individual case values depend on diagnosis severity, duration of product use, age at diagnosis, and other damages factors.
Possibly. Many store-brand talc products were manufactured using talc sourced from the same mines as J&J products and may have had similar asbestos contamination. The key is identifying the manufacturer and supplier of the talc used in the specific product you purchased. An attorney can investigate the supply chain for non-J&J products to determine if a viable claim exists.
There's no strict minimum, but longer use strengthens the claim. Most attorneys look for at least several years of regular perineal use for ovarian cancer claims. For mesothelioma, even shorter periods of exposure can be sufficient since mesothelioma is almost always caused by asbestos exposure. The diagnosis date and your state's statute of limitations are the more critical timing factors.

New tools every week. Stay ahead.