Free legal tools for attorneys and the public - Browse all 260+ tools
Criminal defense

Breathalyzer accuracy checker

Breathalyzer devices are machines - and machines fail. Calibration logs, maintenance records, operator certification, and observation period compliance are all subject to challenge in DUI cases. This checker identifies the specific accuracy issues in your breath test administration that a DUI attorney can challenge.

Takes 3 minutes Free - no signup Last updated:
Ad space - 728x90
Legal information only. Breathalyzer challenges require obtaining and analyzing the actual calibration and maintenance records for the specific device used. This checker identifies issues to investigate - not a guarantee of suppression. Always consult a DUI defense attorney. See our full disclaimer.

Breathalyzer accuracy and reliability checker

Most states require a 15-20 minute continuous observation period before the evidentiary breath test to prevent mouth alcohol contamination. Any interruption is a challenge ground.
Most states require two breath samples within 0.02% of each other. Divergent results indicate unreliable equipment or administration.

Your breathalyzer accuracy analysis

Have a DUI attorney challenge your breath test

An experienced DUI attorney subpoenas calibration records, maintenance logs, and operator certifications to build a complete breathalyzer challenge. Free case review - no obligation.

Confidential. DMV hearing deadline: 7-10 days from arrest.

Why breathalyzer results are not as accurate as prosecutors claim

Breathalyzer devices measure alcohol in breath and convert that measurement to an estimated blood alcohol concentration using a fixed partition ratio of 2100:1 - meaning the device assumes everyone's breath-to-blood ratio is exactly 2100:1. In reality, partition ratios vary from approximately 1700:1 to 2400:1 across individuals. A person with a lower-than-average ratio who blows a 0.09% result may have an actual blood BAC below 0.08%.

Add to this the required maintenance protocols, calibration schedules, and operator training requirements - all of which are frequently not followed perfectly - and you have a device with a documented margin of error of plus or minus 0.01% at minimum. When your result is close to 0.08%, that margin of error matters enormously. A DUI attorney requests the full calibration history of the specific device used in your case through discovery. Pair this analysis with the BAC calculator for a rising blood alcohol analysis and the full DUI defense evaluation for a complete case assessment.

What is the 15-minute observation period and why does it matter?

Before administering an evidentiary breath test, officers in virtually every state must continuously observe the subject for 15 to 20 minutes to ensure no mouth alcohol contamination. Mouth alcohol - from a recent belch, burp, vomit, or use of mouthwash - can cause the device to read significantly higher than actual blood alcohol. If the officer left the room, was distracted, or failed to document continuous observation, the test result is challengeable. Courts have excluded breath test results solely on observation period failures.

What records should your attorney request?

A thorough breathalyzer challenge requires: the device's calibration log for the 12 months surrounding your test, the maintenance and service records, the operator's certification documents and training records, the agency's testing protocols, and the actual printout from your specific test showing all readings. Most of this is obtained through a discovery request or public records request. Some jurisdictions require the state to produce these records automatically before trial; others require a specific motion. An experienced DUI attorney files these requests immediately after retention.

Frequently asked questions about breathalyzer accuracy

Most breathalyzer devices have an accepted margin of error of plus or minus 0.005% to 0.010% BAC under laboratory conditions. In field conditions with real operators, the margin expands. Many states require the two breath samples to be within 0.02% of each other - if they're not, neither result is accepted. When your result is 0.08% to 0.10%, a 0.01% margin of error means the actual BAC could be below the legal limit. This is why results close to the legal threshold are genuinely contested and why attorneys pursue breathalyzer challenges in these cases.
Yes. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes stomach contents - including alcohol - to travel up into the esophagus. When breath is exhaled through the mouth, trace amounts of stomach alcohol are picked up by the breathalyzer and produce artificially elevated readings. This is a well-documented phenomenon in forensic toxicology. Defendants with GERD who had a reflux episode during or shortly before the test have a legitimate medical basis for challenging the breath test result. Medical records documenting GERD are important evidence in this challenge.
Yes. In a low blood sugar or diabetic ketoacidosis state, the body produces isopropanol and acetone as byproducts of fat metabolism. Some breathalyzer devices cannot distinguish between ethanol (alcohol) and these ketone compounds, producing a false positive reading. A person in a hypoglycemic state may register a positive breathalyzer result with zero alcohol consumption. This defense requires medical documentation of the diabetes diagnosis and evidence of a hypoglycemic episode at the time of the stop. Blood test results showing ketones support this defense.
Yes, and several high-profile DUI cases have centered on source code access. Defendants in multiple states have successfully argued that without access to the device's source code, they cannot meaningfully challenge the reliability of the result. Some courts have ordered source code production; others have not. The Intoxilyzer and Draeger devices have been the subject of extensive source code litigation. If the state cannot prove the device's algorithms are accurate through source code review, some courts exclude the results entirely. This is a complex technical defense that requires a DUI attorney with specific technical experience.
If calibration records show the device was overdue for calibration, used the wrong solution, or failed a calibration check, a motion to suppress the breath test result is filed. Courts have granted suppression based solely on calibration failures, even when the defendant's BAC was significantly above the legal limit. Calibration challenges are one of the most frequently successful breathalyzer defenses because the records exist, they're discoverable, and a calibration failure is an objective fact that doesn't require a jury to make a judgment call.

New tools every week. Stay ahead.