Unmarried couples who live together have almost none of the automatic legal protections that marriage provides. No automatic property division, no alimony rights, no inheritance rights without a will. If you've combined finances, bought property together, or one partner has supported the other financially, a cohabitation agreement is the only way to create enforceable rights and obligations between you. This tool builds that agreement.
Parties
Residence
Property and finances
Support and separation
A family law attorney ensures your agreement is enforceable under your state's law and covers issues specific to your financial situation. Free initial consultation.
Marriage automatically creates a legal framework: community property or equitable distribution rules govern asset division, spouses have inheritance rights without a will, and divorce courts have clear authority to divide property and award support. None of this applies automatically to unmarried couples, regardless of how long they've lived together or how intertwined their finances have become. If an unmarried couple separates, courts generally treat each partner's individually-titled property as belonging to whoever's name is on it - regardless of who actually paid for it or contributed to it.
This creates serious risk for the partner who contributed financially to property titled in the other partner's name, who gave up career opportunities to support the household, or who simply assumed years of shared life created some form of entitlement. A cohabitation agreement is the only reliable way to create enforceable financial rights and obligations between unmarried partners. If you eventually marry, the prenuptial agreement or postnuptial agreement tools become more appropriate, since marriage creates a different legal framework entirely.
Palimony refers to support payments awarded to an unmarried partner after separation, based on an implied or express agreement during the relationship - the term comes from combining "pal" and "alimony" following a famous 1976 California case (Marvin v. Marvin). Despite the publicity this case generated, palimony claims remain difficult to win in most states without a written agreement. Courts are skeptical of claimed verbal agreements to support a partner indefinitely, and several states have explicitly refused to recognize palimony claims at all, treating cohabitation as creating no support obligations regardless of circumstances. This underscores why a written cohabitation agreement - rather than relying on an implied agreement claim - is essential if support provisions are intended.
Property titled in both partners' names (a house deed with both names, a jointly titled bank account) generally is treated as jointly owned regardless of actual financial contribution - courts typically apply a presumption of equal ownership for jointly titled property unless the agreement specifies otherwise. However, property titled in only one partner's name remains that partner's property even if the other partner contributed financially, absent a written agreement establishing some other arrangement. This makes the title question (whose name is on what) far more consequential for unmarried couples than for married couples, where marital property rules apply regardless of titling in most cases.