Free legal tools for attorneys and the public - Browse all 260+ tools
Criminal defense

Federal white collar defense screener

Federal white collar investigations often begin quietly - a subpoena, a target letter, or an agent's phone call - long before any charges are filed. By the time charges come, the government has typically spent months building its case. This screener helps you understand where you are in the process and what's at stake based on loss amount, role, and investigation status.

Takes 3 minutes Free - no signup Last updated:
Ad space - 728x90
Legal information only. Federal white collar cases involve extremely technical sentencing guideline calculations. This screener provides general orientation only. Contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediately - before any contact with investigators. See our full disclaimer.

Federal white collar investigation screener

Your federal white collar case assessment

Get a confidential federal defense consultation

If you're under federal investigation, every communication with investigators matters. An experienced federal white collar attorney should be involved before any further contact - even informal conversations. Free, confidential consultation.

Strictly confidential. Attorney-client privilege applies from first contact.

Why "I'm just a witness" can be the most dangerous assumption in a federal case

Federal investigators classify people as witnesses, subjects, or targets - and these classifications can change without notice. A "subject" is someone whose conduct is within the scope of the investigation; a "target" is someone the prosecutor has substantial evidence linking to a crime and is likely to indict. The Department of Justice does not always inform people when their status changes from witness to subject to target. Many people who cooperated as "witnesses" in early interviews later found themselves charged based partly on statements made during those very interviews.

This is why the single most important piece of advice in any federal white collar matter is: do not speak to federal agents without an attorney, regardless of how the request is framed. "Just a few questions," "we just need some background," and "you're not in trouble, we just need to understand the situation" are all common framings used even when the person is already a subject or target. An attorney can often determine your actual status through informal conversations with the prosecutor (sometimes called a "status call") before you say anything substantive. If conspiracy is part of the allegation, understand that conspiracy liability can attach even for relatively minor participation in a scheme - "I only did a small part" is not a defense to conspiracy charges.

How does "loss amount" drive federal white collar sentencing?

Under the federal sentencing guidelines, the base offense level for most fraud offenses starts low (often level 6 or 7) but increases substantially based on the dollar amount of loss - and these increases are dramatic. A $50,000 fraud loss might add 6 levels; a $1.5 million loss might add 14 levels; a $25 million loss might add 22 levels. Each level roughly corresponds to additional months or years of sentencing exposure. This means the "loss amount" calculation - which is often disputed and involves complex questions about actual loss vs. intended loss, victim impact, and credits for amounts returned - can be the single most consequential number in the entire case. Defense attorneys frequently spend enormous effort contesting loss calculations because a successful reduction from, say, $2 million to $400,000 in calculated loss can mean years of difference in sentencing exposure.

What is a proffer session and why is it so risky?

A proffer (sometimes called a "Queen for a Day" agreement) is a meeting where you provide information to prosecutors under an agreement that your statements generally won't be used directly against you - but with significant exceptions. Prosecutors can use proffer statements to investigate further, to impeach you if you testify differently later, and in some agreements, for any purpose if you breach the agreement in any way. Proffer sessions are extremely high-stakes: they can lead to cooperation agreements that significantly reduce sentencing exposure, but they can also reveal information that makes your situation worse if the meeting doesn't go as hoped. No one should attend a proffer session without extensive preparation with an attorney who has reviewed all available evidence first.

Frequently asked questions about federal white collar investigations

A target letter is formal notification from the US Attorney's office that you are the target of a grand jury investigation - meaning prosecutors believe they have substantial evidence connecting you to a crime and are likely to seek an indictment. It often invites you to testify before the grand jury (which you should virtually never do without extensive preparation, and often you'll invoke your Fifth Amendment rights). Receiving a target letter means an indictment is likely imminent. Contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediately - there is often a narrow window where pre-indictment negotiation (a "pre-indictment resolution") can result in a better outcome than waiting for formal charges.
Generally no, and this is a critical issue in corporate investigations. Company counsel represents the company, not individual employees - and the company's interests may directly conflict with yours (the company may cooperate with the government and provide information about your conduct to receive more favorable treatment for itself). If you're interviewed by company counsel during an internal investigation, you should understand that anything you say is not protected by attorney-client privilege as to you personally, and the company can choose to share it with prosecutors. Anyone facing potential individual exposure in a corporate investigation needs separate, personal counsel - paid for by the company in many cases under indemnification provisions, but representing you alone.
Federal sentencing guidelines use the greater of actual loss (what victims actually lost, net of any amounts returned) or intended loss (what the defendant intended to cause, even if the scheme was disrupted before completion or if the actual harm was less). This means a scheme that intended to defraud victims of $5 million but was stopped after only $500,000 was taken can still be sentenced based on the $5 million intended loss figure in some cases. This is a frequent area of dispute - defense attorneys argue for actual loss calculations and challenge inflated intended loss theories, particularly in cases involving undercover operations or schemes that were never realistically capable of the alleged scope.
Yes. Federal restitution statutes (particularly the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act) often require restitution for the full amount of victim losses related to the offense conduct, regardless of the specific charge of conviction - and regardless of the defendant's ability to pay. Restitution orders can follow defendants for the rest of their lives, with the government able to garnish wages, tax refunds, and other assets indefinitely until paid in full. Restitution amounts are negotiated as part of plea agreements in many cases, and the specific calculation methodology is an important part of any white collar plea negotiation.
Substantial assistance under USSG ยง5K1.1, similar to drug cases, allows sentences below the guideline range (and below any applicable mandatory minimum) for defendants who provide significant, truthful cooperation that helps the government prosecute others. In multi-defendant white collar cases, cooperation is often the single largest sentencing factor - defendants who cooperate early and substantially frequently receive sentences a fraction of what co-defendants who didn't cooperate receive. The decision to cooperate involves complex strategic, ethical, and personal considerations that require careful attorney guidance, ideally before any charges are even filed.

New tools every week. Stay ahead.