The same matter can cost wildly different amounts depending on whether it's billed hourly, flat fee, or contingency. This tool estimates total cost across each structure so you can compare before you sign.
An attorney can review your specific situation and recommend the fee arrangement that makes the most financial sense for you.
Hourly billing charges for actual time spent, which means total cost is unpredictable until the matter concludes. A flat fee sets one price upfront for a defined scope of work, giving cost certainty but only for work that stays within that defined scope. Contingency fees charge nothing upfront and instead take a percentage, commonly 25% to 40%, of any eventual settlement or judgment, so the attorney only gets paid if the client wins or settles.
The right structure depends heavily on the type of matter. Recovery-based claims like personal injury are well suited to contingency since there's a clear dollar recovery to take a percentage from. Transactional work like a will or a simple contract is well suited to flat fee since the scope is defined and predictable. Ongoing litigation with an uncertain path is often billed hourly precisely because nobody can accurately predict the total hours at the outset. Once you've compared structures here, formalize the terms with our engagement letter builder or check contingency-specific numbers with the contingency fee calculator.
Not necessarily. A flat fee is priced to cover the attorney's expected time plus a margin for the risk that the matter runs longer than expected, so it can end up higher than hourly billing would have cost if the matter resolves quickly. The advantage of flat fee isn't guaranteed savings, it's cost certainty regardless of how the matter actually unfolds.
Contingency percentages look large against a settlement number, but they compensate the attorney for taking on the risk of being paid nothing at all if the case is lost, plus fronting case costs like expert witnesses and filing fees along the way. An attorney evaluating 100 contingency cases expects to lose or settle low on some of them, and the percentage on winning cases has to cover that risk across the whole portfolio of work.
Yes. Hybrid arrangements exist, such as a reduced hourly rate paired with a smaller contingency percentage, or a flat fee for an initial phase followed by hourly billing if the matter escalates into litigation. These hybrid structures split the risk between attorney and client rather than placing it entirely on one side.